What class for a Ford Adrenalin?

[sprusak1]

I'm stuck trying to figure out what class it would be in? It's n/a, so I'd think it's in "f" class like the s-10 extreme, not "e" like the lightning.

[nxstang]

i LOL'd

[86Fox]

F, but I'll resurch for sure. I have to look it up.

[otter]

I've never heard of such a vehicle.

*googles*

huh. Can that thing safely get around an autocross course? Seems kinda high and narrow.

[Faster]

I think the center of gravity is too high on that vehicle.

How does it compare to the Chevy Colorado?

[86Fox]

:DLots of fun as long as you go real slow.

[PowerLabs]

http://blogs.cars.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/10/25/2008sporttrac500.jpg


I'm 99% sure that has one of these on its windshield visor:

http://www.cars101.com/subaru/forester/forester09warning1.JPG

It might be dangerous to autocross it...

[Smokedmustang]

I will Check with NASA on this one. I know that we had pick up trucks before racing with us, but they had a lower stance. if these have stiffer suspension (Sure they do) then the lower stanced ones, this may be fine.

[Yamaha]

hey butters, those are stiffer, lowered a few inches, and rock alloy 20's, nice trucks and I think it'd be ok. The colorado that ran with us was far from stock ride height. I still remember the srt10 ram from WW2, it was allowed to run and they sit higher than these....lol

[brakenit]

Actually the first year I ran my Colorado it was bone stock suspension wise, along with the crew cab ZQ8 Colorado that ran. The second year it was lowered ~2" with Belltech springs and swaybars. I don't know how the truck in question handles, Fords are rollover prone anyway. :rofl: